[A prospective comparative study on effectiveness of single versus continuous adductor canal block combined with local infiltration anesthesia in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Objective: To compare the early analgesic effects and the impact on knee joint function recovery after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between single adductor canal block (SACB) and continuous adductor canal block (CACB) combined with local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) using a prospective study. Methods: The patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted between April 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled as a subject. Among them, 60 patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the SACB group or CACB group in a ratio of 1:1 using a random number table method. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in terms of age, gender, height, body mass, body mass index, affected side, and preoperative resting visual analogue scale (VAS) score and active VAS score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score. All patients received multimodal analgesia management using LIA combined with SACB or CACB. The operation time, pain related indicators (resting and activity VAS scores, number and timing of breakthrough pain, opioid consumption), joint function related indicators (quadriceps muscle strength, knee range of motion, OKS score, and HSS score), as well as postoperative block complications and adverse events were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( P<0.05). All patients in the two groups were followed up with a follow-up time of (9.70±4.93) months in the SACB group and (12.23±5.05) months in the CACB group, and the difference was not significant ( P>0.05). The CACB group had a significant lower resting VAS score at 24 hours after operation compared to the SACB group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in resting and active VAS scores between the two groups at other time points ( P>0.05). The CACB group had a significantly lower incidence of breakthrough pain compared to the SACB group [9 cases (30.00%) vs. 17 cases (56.67%); P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the timing of breakthrough pain occurrence and opioid consumption between the two groups ( P>0.05). Four cases in the SACB group and 7 cases in the CACB group experienced adverse events, with no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups ( P>0.05). The CACB group had significantly better knee joint mobility than the SACB group at 1 and 2 days after operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in knee joint mobility on 0 day after operation and quadriceps muscle strength and OKS and HSS scores at different time points ( P>0.05). Conclusion: In UKA, the analgesic effects and knee joint function recovery are similar when compared between LIA combined with SACB and LIA combined with CACB. However, SACB is simpler to perform and can avoid adverse events such as catheter displacement and dislocation. Therefore, SACB may be a better choice.

Intrathecal Analgesia via a Percutaneous Port With Patient-Controlled Intrathecal Analgesia for the Management of Movement-Evoked Breakthrough Cancer Pain of Refractory Lower Extremity Cancer Pain: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal analgesia (ITA) is a valuable treatment option for refractory cancer-related pain. However, there is still no general consensus on the analgesic effect of movement-evoked breakthrough pain (MEBTP) in the ITA setting. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a retrospective observational study to examine the effect of ITA via percutaneous port (ITAPP) with patient-controlled ITA (PCIA) on analgesic efficacy, emphasizing MEBTP in patients with refractory lower extremity cancer pain. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review included all patients with refractory lower extremity cancer pain who received ITAPP at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2020. METHODS: Data on the Numeric Rating Scale scores of spontaneous resting pain intensity (SRPI) and MEBTP intensity (MEPI), opioid doses, and perceived time to onset were collected from medical records prior to ITAPP and at a one-month postimplant visit. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were included in the study group. Mean SRPI decreased from 8.75 pre-ITAPP to 3.75 post-ITAPP (P < 0.05); mean MEPI fell from 8.83 pre-ITAPP to 4.25 post-ITAPP (P < 0.05); mean daily morphine equivalent dosing decreased from 360 mg/d to 48 mg/d (P < 0.05); and mean daily morphine equivalent dosing for MEBTP decreased from 87 mg/d to 6 mg/d (P < 0.05). Both total and breakthrough dosing of conventional opioid medications significantly decreased following the initiation of ITAPP with PCIA. The mean perceived time to onset with conventional MEBT medications was 38 minutes, and the mean perceived time to onset with PCIA was 8 minutes (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: An effective analysis of IT opioid efficacy was not possible because the power of such a small sample size was low. Second, it is a retrospective study without long-term follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory lower extremity cancer pain, ITAPP with PCIA was associated with improved pain control. Compared with conventional MEBTP regimens, appropriate ITAPP with PCIA provided superior analgesia and a much faster onset of action.

Efficacy of reconstituted intravenous fentanyl to sublingual solution versus oral morphine syrup for breakthrough pain among patients with chronic gynecologic cancer pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Rapid-acting fentanyl formulations are superior to oral morphine (OM) syrup in controlling breakthrough pain among patients with cancer, but they are expensive and unavailable in many countries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of reconstituted intravenous fentanyl to sublingual solution (IFS) in relieving breakthrough pain as compared with OM. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial, patients with gynecologic cancer aged ≥18 years experiencing chronic cancer pain with breakthrough pain were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either 50 µg IFS or 5 mg OM. Pain intensity level was assessed at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after treatment. The primary outcome was the reduction in pain intensity at 15 min in the intention-to-treat population (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05037539). RESULTS: Between June 15, 2021 and December 30, 2021, 40 participants were equally and randomly assigned to receive IFS or OM. The primary outcome was significantly higher in the IFS group (4.25 vs. 1.05, p < 0.0001). The secondary outcomes also showed higher reduction in pain intensity at 5 min in the IFS group. Subsequent breakthrough pain did not differ between the two groups. However, the reduction in pain was lower in the IFS group at 45, 60, and 120 min, where pain was classified as mild. No severe adverse effects were observed in both groups. Burning sensation without noticeable lesion was found in 20% of the IFS group. CONCLUSION: IFS can reduce early breakthrough pain. IFS may be considered for breakthrough pain when rapid-acting fentanyl formulations are unavailable.

Breakthrough pain in patients with multiple myeloma: a secondary analysis of IOPS MS study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize breakthrough pain (BTcP) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a large multicenter study of patients with BTcP. Background pain intensity and opioid doses were recorded. The BTcP characteristics, including the number of BTcP episodes, intensity, onset, duration, predictability, and interference with daily activities were recorded. Opioids prescribed for BTcP, time to achieve a meaningful pain relief after taking a medication, adverse effects, and patients' satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with MM were examined. In comparison with other tumors, in patients with MM BTcP was more predictable (p=0.04), with the predominant trigger being the physical activity (p<0.001). Other BTcP characteristics, pattern of opioids used for background pain and BTcP, satisfaction and adverse effects did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MM have their own peculiarities. Given the peculiar involvement of the skeleton, BTcP was highly predictable and triggered by movement.

Predicting tolerability of high-dose fentanyl buccal tablets in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fentanyl buccal tablets (FBTs) are a rapid-onset opioid indicated for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) and FBT titration is needed to optimize BTcP management. We aimed to predict which patients could tolerate a high dose of FBT (400 µg or more at a time). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the final FBT dose. The final FBT doses were compared according to the clinical features. The prediction accuracy of patients tolerant of 400 µg or higher FBT was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A risk scoring model based on the odds ratio (OR) was developed from the final multivariable model, and patients were assigned into two groups: low tolerance (0-1 point) and high tolerance (2-3 points). RESULTS: Among 131 patients, the most frequently effective dose of FBT was 200 µg (54%), followed by 100 µg (30%). The median value of morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) was 60 mg/day, and the most common daily use was 3-4 times/day. In multivariable analysis, male sex, younger age, and use of FBTs three or more times per day were independently associated with high-dose FBT. According to the risk scoring model, the patients with a final FBT of 400 µg or higher were significantly more in the high tolerance group (17%) compared to the low tolerance group (3%; p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: According to the dose relationship between the final FBT dose and the clinical features, three factors (sex, age, daily use of FBT) were independently associated with the final dose of FBT. Our risk score model could help predict tolerance to high-dose FBT and guide the titration plan for BTcP.

A case report of immediate effects of acupuncture on neuropathic cancer breakthrough pain.

INTRODUCTION: Acupuncture is a promising treatment for visceral cancer pain, but to date, evidence for immediate effects on neuropathic pain is limited. CASE PRESENTATION: This report presents a case of immediate pain relief by single-needle acupuncture on opioid-refractory neuropathic breakthrough pain in a 78-year-old female breast cancer patient with cervical bone metastases. Acupuncture was applied at a single point neuroanatomically correlating to the pain affected spinal segment. DISCUSSION: Immediately after acupuncture, the patient reported a complete pain relief lasting for one day. In the following days, neuropathic breakthrough pain was better manageable with reduced dosages of opioids. Acupuncture is possibly effective in providing immediate and safe pain relief in neuropathic cancer pain through neuromodulating effects on the spinal and central nervous level. Randomized controlled studies with individualized acupuncture point protocols are needed to establish efficacy and safety.

Breakthrough Pain: A Qualitative Study of Patients with Advanced Cancer in Northwest China.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough pain is an extremely painful symptom that impairs quality of life in cancer patients. It negatively impacts their emotional wellbeing, physical function, and mental health. The aim of this study is to use a qualitative methodology to examine the perception of cancer patients with breakthrough pain in the Northwest of China. METHODS: A semi-structured, face-to-face interview was conducted with nine cancer patients who experienced breakthrough pain; and a qualitative content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Five themes were generated: (1) sufferings from breakthrough cancer pain, (2) hopelessness and helplessness, (3) perception of breakthrough cancer pain and analgesia, (4) strong as a Chinese, and (5) support needed from health care system. CONCLUSION: Although certain traditional cultural worldviews increase patients' acceptance of pain, healthcare providers need proper treatment guidelines to improve the quality of cancer patient care in Northwest China. We recommend that healthcare workers and hospital managers place cancer pain management in higher priority. Relevant pain management education programs should be provided to both healthcare providers and patients to improve their knowledge in these area. Healthcare professionals need to establish a mutual communication channel between patients and healthcare workers to meet patients' needs during breakthrough pain episodes in order to improve pain management. Nevertheless, the government and the healthcare system need to recognize the importance and urgency of palliative care services.

Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets in Breakthrough Cancer Pain Management According to Cancer Stage and Background Opioid Medication.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effect of sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) on pain relief, quality of life, and adverse effects in patients with cancer pain, according to cancer stage and background opioid regimen. METHODS: Subgroup analyses from a recently completed study were performed according to cancer stage (locally advanced cancer [LAC] vs. metastatic cancer) and most frequent background opioid medication (fentanyl vs. oxycodone/naloxone). The efficacy and safety of SFTs were evaluated, recording pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, and adverse events (AEs). Health status was assessed with the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety subscale [HADS-A] and depression subscale [HADS-D]). RESULTS: In total, 54 (67.5%) patients had LAC and 26 (32.5%) had metastatic cancer. The oxycodone/naloxone group included 39 patients (48.1%) and the fentanyl group 29 (35.8%). In all subgroups, pain relief was achieved within 5 min in an increasing number of individuals over time; at the end of the study, PI values decreased (PI-end: 44.4% for LAC vs. 57.9% for metastatic cancer; 44.4% for fentanyl vs. 38.6% for oxycodone/naloxone). HADS and mental component summary (MCS) SF-12v2 scores significantly improved in the LAC group (HADS-A 9.44-8.04; HADS-D 10.46-8.15; MCS 44.69-45.94) and in the fentanyl group (HADS-A 10.05-8.33; HADS-D 11.95-8.76; MCS 44.38-47.19). AEs were reported in few patients and were mostly mild. CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory subgroup analyses show the efficacy and safety of SFTs for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer, regardless of their cancer stage and background opioid medication.

Dolor irruptivo y calidad de vida: estudio comparativo de la percepción por parte de los médicos y los pacientes oncológicos / Breakthrough pain and quality of life: A comparative study of the perception by physicians and cancer patients

OBJETIVO: El propósito de este estudio fue investigar el grado de concordancia entre pacientes que sufren dolor irruptivo oncológico y los médicos que los tratan en la percepción del dolor y la calidad de vida (CdV). MÉTODO: Se llevó a cabo un estudio multicéntrico, transversal y observacional. La información sobre el dolor y la CdV se recogió mediante las herramientas Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) y EuroQoL five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D), ambas completadas por los médicos y los pacientes. También se recogieron los datos sociodemográficos y clínicos, incluyendo la puntuación de la capacidad funcional ECOG. Para el análisis de la concordancia en las percepciones de la CdV y el dolor entre médicos y pacientes se calcularon los coeficientes de correlación intraclase y el estadístico κ ponderado. Resultado: Un total de 129 médicos y 472 pacientes participaron en el estudio. Casi todos los doctores (98,4%) tenían experiencia previa en el manejo de pacientes con dolor irruptivo oncológico. Con relación a la intensidad de dolor y al impacto de este en la vida cotidiana, los coeficientes de correlación intraclase (todos por encima de 0,84) indicaron que había un alto grado de acuerdo entre las valoraciones de los médicos y la de los pacientes. Para la CdV, se observó una buena concordancia entre médicos y pacientes, con estadísticos κ desde 0,61 (ítem de ansiedad/depresión) a 0,75 (ítem de actividades de la vida diaria). La declaración del dolor experimentado por los pacientes fue de 8 para la intensidad máxima y de 5 para la intensidad media. CONCLUSIONES: En este estudio de práctica clínica habitual, los médicos participantes eran razonablemente conocedores del nivel de funcionalidad y bienestar de sus pacientes, siendo la percepción del componente psicológico (ansiedad/depresión) de la CdV la menos concordante. Estos hallazgos ayudan a conocer mejor la prevalencia e intensidad del dolor, su interferencia con las actividades de la vida diaria y la CdV en pacientes oncológicos con dolor irruptivo oncológico, un paso esencial para mejorar el manejo del dolor asociado a cáncer

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the agreement on perceptions of pain and quality of life (QoL) between patients with cancer-related breakthrough pain and their treating physicians. METHOD: A multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study was performed. Pain and QoL information was collected using the Brief Pain Inventory and the EuroQoL five-dimensional questionnaire completed by physicians and PATIENTS: Agreement between patient- and physician-perceived QoL and pain scores was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted κ statistics. RESULTS: A total of 129 physicians and 472 patients participated in the study. Almost all doctors (98.4%) had previous experience in managing patients with cancer breakthrough pain. For pain intensity and impact of pain on daily life, intraclass correlation coefficients (all exceeding 0.84) indicated that there was strong agreement between physician and patient assessments. For QoL, good concordance was found between patients and physicians, with weighted κ statistic ranging from 0.61 (anxiety/depression item) to 0.75 (daily activities item). Patient pain reports were 8.0 for the worst pain, and 5.0 for mean pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, physicians were reasonably aware of their patients' level of functioning and well-being, with gaps only in the psychological dimension (anxiety/depression) of QoL. These findings contribute to a better understanding of pain prevalence and intensity, interference of pain with daily activities, and QoL in cancer patients with breakthrough pain, and are an essential step towards improving cancer pain management

Characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain and its influence on quality of life in an international cohort of patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Breakthrough cancer pain (BTP) represents a treatment challenge. Objectives were to examine the prevalence and characteristics of BTP in an international sample of patients with cancer, and to investigate the relationship between BTP and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional multicentre study. Participating patients completed self-report questionnaires on a touch-screen laptop computer, including the Brief Pain Inventory, Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (ABPAT) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study was performed in 17 centres in 8 countries and involved 4 languages (Norwegian, Italian, German and English). RESULTS: Records from a convenience sample of 978 patients with advanced cancer were analysed; mean age was 62.2 years, 48.3% were women and 84.4% had metastatic disease. A total of 296 patients (30%) had no pain, defined as worst pain in the past 24 hours <1 on a 0-10 scale. Of the 682 patients with a pain score ≥1, 393 (58%) reported no BTP on the screening item, while 289 (30%) confirmed flare ups of BTP. Patients with BTP reported significantly higher pain intensity scores (<0.001) than patients without BTP; 57.1% of patients rated BTP at its worst as being severe: ≥7 on a 0-10 scale. Time from onset to peak intensity was <10 min for 42.9%, and average time to pain relief was 27.1 min. BTP was commonly triggered by medication wearing off (28%). Patients with BTP had significantly worse mean outcomes on 10 of 15 functional and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (<0.001). Severe pain intensity in the last week was a powerful predictor of BTP (OR 4.1) and poor QoL (OR 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: BTP is highly prevalent with prolonged episodes despite analgaesics, and has a pervasive impact on QoL. Patients reporting high pain intensity should be carefully evaluated for BTP and efficacy of analgaesic treatment, to provide optimal pain management and improve QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00972634; Results.

'Old' and 'new' drugs for the treatment of cancer pain.

INTRODUCTION: More than 20 years ago the World Health Organization (WHO) published the booklet 'Cancer Pain Relief', including the fundamentals and clear principles, which was summarized in five simple sentences: 'by mouth', 'by the clock', 'by the ladder', 'for the individual' and 'attention to detail'. Over the years, several modifications to the analgesic ladder have been proposed, as the addition of two further steps, related to the switch of opioid and/or non-invasive route of administration, and to the use of invasive approaches, or again the skip of the second step; nevertheless the educational value and benefits related to the worldwide dissemination are of paramount importance. AREAS COVERED: To date, all the guidelines are inspired by the strategy of WHO; below some of the most important international guidelines published in the last two years are compared, particularly as regards the criteria of choice of opioids for moderate/severe pain. EXPERT OPINION: The discussion on the role of the second step of the WHO analgesic ladder is still open. The challenge for new formulations of 'old' opioids will be to better manage cancer pain, with more tailored efficacy and possibly less side effects.

Beyond the traditional definition of breakthrough pain: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is traditionally defined as a transitory pain flare in opioid-treated patients with chronic background pain. This definition has, however, been challenged in recent years. This study aimed to analyze BTP prevalence in different pain conditions. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational study conducted from June to September 2011 in two Italian pain treatment reference centres. Consecutive patients aged >18 years with oncological or non-oncological pain were eligible for this study; background pain was acute/ subacute (<3 months) or chronic (>3 months). The characteristics of pain were evaluated by means of a structured interview by physicians, and patients were asked to complete a dedicated clinical study form. The following outcomes were assessed: chronic pain duration (in patients with chronic pain), BTP prevalence, and number and severity of daily BTP episodes. All outcomes were assessed in four populations of patients with: (a) chronic oncological pain; (b) chronic non-oncological pain; (c) non-chronic oncological pain; (d) non-chronic non-oncological pain. The correlation between BTP and gender was also investigated. RESULTS: Of 1,270 patients with chronic pain, 1,086 had non-oncological pain (85.5%). Most patients (68.6%) with non-oncological pain were female (P = 0.001). Pain duration was significantly longer in non-oncological pain versus oncological pain groups (P = 0.002). BTP prevalence was lower in non-oncological patients (P < 0.001). No differences were reported in terms of number and severity of daily BTP episodes. BTP was more frequent in females with non-oncological pain (P = 0.04). Females had a significantly higher pain severity (P = 0.02) than males. CONCLUSION: BTP is frequently reported in patients who do not have BTP according to the traditional definition. BTP frequency and severity is similar in oncological and non-oncological pain.

How nurses assess breakthrough cancer pain, and the impact of this pain on patients' daily lives--results of a European survey.

PURPOSE: To increase our knowledge of how nurses assess breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP); and whether they find it difficult to distinguish BTCP from background pain; how they estimate the impact of BTCP on patients' daily lives, and the factors that nurses consider to induce BTCP. Variations in their use of assessment tools and their ability to distinguish between different types of pain were also examined in terms of the number of years of oncology nursing experience and the practice in different countries. METHODS: In total, 1241 nurses (90% female) who care for patients with cancer, from 12 European countries, completed a survey questionnaire. KEY RESULTS: Half the sample had >9 years of experience in oncology nursing. Although 39% had no pain assessment tool to help them distinguish between types of pain, 95% of those who used a tool found it useful. Furthermore, 37% reported that they had problems distinguishing background pain from BTCP. Movement was identified as the factor that most commonly exacerbated BTCP across all countries. The nurses reported that BTCP greatly interfered with patients' everyday activities, and they rated the patients' enjoyment of life as most strongly affected. The use of tools and the ability to distinguish between different pains varied between European countries and with years of experience in oncology nursing. CONCLUSIONS: The nurses reported that BTCP greatly interfered with patients' lives, and many nurses had problems distinguishing between background pain and BTCP. Nurses require more knowledge about BTCP management, and guidelines should be developed for clinical use.